READ CAREFULLY. By viewing this site you agree, on behalf of yourself and/or your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with you, you employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.
We’ve now been introduced to McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin, that two-fisted, moose-shootin’-and-dressin’ tuff-talkin’ hockey mom, that “pit bull” in lipstick, who wowed the nation with her experience and toughness last week at the Republican convention. We all look forward to learning more about her, but we’ve been told she won’t actually talk to the press until she’s freshened up her makeup, feels a little less scattered, and knows Larry King won’t be mean to her.
Yes, it sounds stereotypically feminine, but really, this is classic online macho behavior. Male or female, the ones who beat their chests hardest, stomp, snort, and in general make a lot of noise about being hardnosed hombres who stare reality square in the eye are the same right-wing message posters who’ll start looking frantically around for an exit once the discussion gets more complex than “liberals are doody-heads” or “I’m gonna kick yer ass!”
The best explanation for this tendency I’ve heard has come from a blogger who pointed out the influence of right wing media and the mute button. We now have a generation of young adults who grew up listening to people like Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly and who therefore “understand” how a conversation with a liberal is supposed to go:
The right-winger makes a statement. A liberal calls in and argues. The right-winger responds to the liberal, perhaps upping the ante a bit by injecting a wee bit of personal insult into the brew. The liberal responds again, a bit headedly. About then, or maybe one or two exchanges later, the right wing host presses the button that turns off the liberal caller’s voice and engages in a monologue about the sheer dumbness of liberals in general, how much they hate America, and the extent to which the caller is an exemplar of the utter commie-pinko femnaziness of liberals. This is used as a platform from which subsequent right wing callers can comment, affirming the stupidity of liberals in general and congratulating the right-winger on “wiping the floor” with that lousy liberal.
I’m not a mind reader, so I can’t say exactly what it is that ditto-heads think when they hear this on the radio. Perhaps some of them honestly imagine that the liberal isn’t responding to Rush because s/he has been abashed into silence by the force of right-wing arguments. But Bill O’Reilly does this on television, even announces his intent of turning off someone’s mic, and I’ve seen shots of people’s lips moving in a vain attempt to make their point while Bill declares victory and does his little superiority dance. So obviously lots of these folks know what’s going on and consider stuffing a sock in someone’s mouth and then declaiming over their muffled protests a form of intelligent argument.
The other person, you see, is supposed to shut up at some point and leave the floor to the right-winger. Liberals (or perceived liberals, like anyone in the press) who don’t do this, and who ask dumb questions like “what do you mean?” or “how would this policy impact people in real life?” are being mean, combative, and just plain uppity.
This is the base McCain hopes to appeal to by taking Palin as a running mate. They’re not going to be embarrassed by Palin’s refusal to answer questions.
They’re going to nod, give the thumbs up and say, “Damned straight!”
I am a white woman of a certain age, i.e. one of the voters John McCain was hoping to win over to the dark side. To say he miscalculated in his pick of Sarah Palin is an understatement of Biblical proportions. Maybe he thought women were so disappointed in Obama's choice of an older white guy for his VP, that they would run to an even older white guy who had a Tina Fey look-alike for his running mate. The one big negative that stood out for me was NOT the Troopergate scandal, not her love of earmarks, not her pregnant unmarried daughter (a victim of abstinence only education), not even her support of Alaskan secession - her biggest black mark in a pile of fecund stench is one that all the talking heads are tiptoeing around, but women note - how her ambition effects her handicapped baby.
All children should have love and attention from their parents, but a child with Down's syndrome needs even more than that. My nephew was born with a birth defect that seriously impaired his ability to process food. His mother (my sister-in-law) gave up a thriving career to wrestle with the medical industry, insurance industry, and various government agencies on his behalf. Her son is her full-time job. Now Ms. Palin, with the power of her position, may be able to get more assistance in some matters, but her son still needs her. If she is truly representative of "family values", then she should be willing to sacrifice her ambition for her child.
For much of his long career in Washington, John McCain has been throwing darts at the special spending system known as earmarking, through which powerful members of Congress can deliver federal cash for pet projects back home with little or no public scrutiny. He's even gone so far as to publish "pork lists" detailing these financial favors.
Three times in recent years, McCain's catalogs of "objectionable" spending have included earmarks for this small Alaska town, requested by its mayor at the time -- Sarah Palin.
...records show that Palin -- first as mayor of Wasilla and recently as governor of Alaska -- was far from shy about pursuing tens of millions in earmarks for her town, her region and her state.
This year, Palin, who has been governor for nearly 22 months, defended earmarking as a vital part of the legislative system. "The federal budget, in its various manifestations, is incredibly important to us, and congressional earmarks are one aspect of this relationship," she wrote in a newspaper column.
But wait, it gets MUCH. MUCH better. Here is Palin, IN HER OWN WORDS, taking a newspaper to task for saying she was critical of earmarks:
I feel compelled to respond to your gross mischaracterization (March 2, “Earful of Earmarks”) of my position on congressional earmarks.
I am not among those who have said “earmarks are nothing more than pork projects being shoveled home by an overeager congressional delegation.” I recognize that Congress, which exercises the power of the purse, has the constitutional responsibility to put its mark on the federal budget, including adding funds that the president has not proposed.
1) Both have a creepy smile - though the Joker's makes one want to run away, while Bush's smirk makes one want to smack him.
2) Both start out with expendable criminals as henchmen, then end up with the hard-core insane (paranoid schizos for the Joker, neocons for Bush).
3) Both play on people's fears, to the point of making them turn on each other and those that actually can help (like Batman).
4) Both make women uncomfortable. The Joker fondles heroic lawyer Rachel's face as he threatens her; Bush fondles German Chancellor Herkel's shoulders as he invades her personal space.
5) Both use other people to do their dirty work, though admittedly, the Joker is more hands-on.
6) Both believe in collateral damage. The Joker blows up a hospital as part of his demented plan; Bush destroys the Constitution, multiple countries, and the city of New Orleans as part of his demented plan.
The Joker gets the last laugh though. When Batman goes Guantanamo on him to get vital information out of him, it does no good because the Joker is INSANE AND DOESN'T CARE.
One final observation on movies in general: One reason the X Files movie tanked at the box office was the "I told you so" factor. For all the seasons the show was on, it told us: "TRUST NO ONE", and we didn't listen. So when, in the movie, Mulder and Scully are waiting in an FBI hallway staring sardonically at the official photo of Mr. Bush and the X-Files theme wells up, it was a slap-in-the-face reminder to the American public that "You voted this guy in for TWO terms." THAT is an X-File.
I am currently attending DragonCon in Atlanta and enjoying a bit of a respite from politics. Being a Trekkie (and old enough to remember when that was not considered an offensive term) I have attended this convention every year since the middle 80's, and find it a pleasant way to spend Labor Day, in the company of fellow SciFi/comic/gaming/computer geeks.
My respite was short-lived though, since politics was pretty much the topic of the day. While aboard the MARTA on my way back from the the con, I encountered a very enthusiastic gentleman looking to register voters, which resulted in a spontaneous discussion of McCain's pathetic VP pick. The gentleman, an Obama supporter, talked about losing his job to "downsizing", so since he had lots of "free time" he decided to help register voters. The train was also full of people dressed in orange down for the Clemson-Alabama game. A nearby Clemsonite started to fidget mightily in the course of our conversation and as my companion and I dissected why McCain's decision was stupid, cynically political, and complete hypocrisy, he got downright red in the face.
I then made a point of addressing the latest GOP talking points, and my companion ably smacked each one down as I set them up. As each point fell, we could see our Clemson man losing steam.
Finally, unable to contain himself, he blurted out that now "Obama has to address the issues, just like McCain", since neither candidate can use the "experience" talking point. My companion and I didn't even bother looking at the man, we just smiled, and continued hammering McCain.
The guy got off on the next stop, even though I don't think it was his stop.
I had seen a LOT of Obama signs and stickers, and not a single McCain presence until Saturday when Clemson and Alabama fans arrived in force. Suddenly, the Marta parking lot showed support for the Dark Side, though not as much as you would expect.
Meanwhile, at DragonCon, the hot selling t-shirt was this one:
CNN is all over the speculation that Sara Palin, first term governor of Alaska will be McCain's pick for VP. While I have no clue whether this is true or not (reporters are so gullible), I would give McCain credit for a surprise move. Picking the first woman VP... oh, wait, the Democrats did that twenty-four years ago. Well, she certainly brings a wealth of experience to the job, you know, as a first term governor of a state with six people and ten million caribou (lot of oil though).
She's definitely bring in those angry Hillary Clinton voters with her rabid anti-abortion views.
And of course, her squeaky clean administration will bolster McCain's ethical problems, provided no one mentions this little problem.
I'm skeptical. The GOP doing anything vaguely progressive is pretty much unheard of. Also, GOP mouthpiece, ABC News, begs to disagree on Palin.
John McCain tapped little-known Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be his vice presidential running mate on Friday in a startling selection on the eve of the Republican National Convention.
Two senior campaign officials disclosed McCain's decision a few hours before the Republican presidential nominee-to-be and his newly-minted running mate appeared at a rally in swing-state Ohio.
Palin, like McCain, is a conservative with a maverick streak who has shown a willingness to clash with others in her own party. A self-styled hockey mom and political reformer, she has been governor of her state less than two years.
A maverick like McCain.
Really.
Well the chattering classes will eat this up. Expect lots of talk about how McCain will get all the Hillary supporters with his move.
Can't wait to see the debate between her and Biden on foreign policy.
Police in Denver arrested an ABC News producer today as he and a camera crew were attempting to take pictures on a public sidewalk of Democratic Senators and VIP donors leaving a private meeting at the Brown Palace Hotel.
Couldn't happen to nicer folks.
ABC has fought with Fox News for the honor of the being biggest collaborator with BushCo, helping cheerlead for the illegal war in Iraq, bolstering lies about Iraq being behind the anthrax attacks, running 9/11 "docudramas" praising the administration while smearing Democrats, and pretty much turning a blind eye to the country's decent into tyranny under Bush.
By Tuesday, officials had decided the three men didn't have the capacity to act on their racist impulses, no matter how heavily armed they were. But the whole episode was a strange, and alarming, reminder of why Obama has had Secret Service protection since the spring of 2007 -- there are a lot of people out there who hate the idea of a black president, and are crazy enough to say they'll do something about it. The arrests raised the frightening specter of yet another of America's charismatic young leaders being gunned down by a lunatic. Obama aides declined to comment, citing a strict policy of not discussing security.
The arrests seemed more threatening when they first became public. Serious brass was pulled in; Attorney General Michael Mukasey was briefed. But Tuesday, after an investigation involving three different federal agencies, Colorado's U.S. attorney, Troy Eid, announced that authorities had decided Adolf, Johnson and Gartrell were basically not as dangerous as they looked. The feds didn't plan to charge any of the three men with threatening a presidential candidate, a federal felony that comes with a possible five-year prison term. Instead, Eid charged Adolf (who is variously referred to as Adolph and Adolf in federal documents) and Johnson with violating federal bans on felons owning weapons, and Gartrell with drug possession. (Admittedly, the fact that the three thought Obama was staying in the exurban hotel in which they had rented a room made it seem like they hadn't planned very carefully.)
If the target had been McCain, you can bet these fellows would be in a black hole somewhere being tortured until the confessed being hired by Obama.
Long before the mortgage crisis began rocking Main Street and Wall Street, a top FBI official made a chilling, if little-noticed, prediction: The booming mortgage business, fueled by low interest rates and soaring home values, was starting to attract shady operators and billions in losses were possible.
"It has the potential to be an epidemic," Chris Swecker, the FBI official in charge of criminal investigations, told reporters in September 2004. But, he added reassuringly, the FBI was on the case. "We think we can prevent a problem that could have as much impact as the S&L crisis," he said.
But we didn't, and we haven't, and as a result this is costing about ten times the S&L debacle, and will probably sink the economy for a decade or more.
Seriously, just why do we have an FBI? The most unbelievable aspect of the X-Files TV series for me was not liver-eating monsters, aliens, or vampire sheriffs, but the idea that FBI was in any way competent.
Despite repeated warnings from agents in the field, the FBI failed to stop the 9/11 attacks. In fact, the FBI's track record for solving crimes and bringing the right person to justice is abysmal. The Unabomber operated with impunity for years and the FBI was completely clueless as to who he was. The only reason he was caught is because his brother fingered him.
The really aggravating thing about this is that every time there is a major crime committed and the FBI screws up, they whine that they could have prevented the crime, if only they weren't hampered by those pesky civil rights laws in the Constitution. Congress then grants them more, and more waivers, which still doesn't allow them to catch any actual criminals or solve any crimes, but it does allow them to cover up their own crimes more efficiently.
By and large, the criminals investigated by the FBI are one rubber mask short of a Scooby Doo villain, yet the FBI makes them out to be criminal masterminds. On the occasion when they do find themselves up against a genuine Professor Moriarty, the public's only hope is that an friend, family member or accomplice will rat them out.
It is time to scrap the FBI, and begin again from scratch. This time, could we avoid giving every clown with delusions of competence a badge, a gun and a national security letter?
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said in an interview Wednesday that he was uncertain how many houses he and his wife, Cindy, own.
"I think — I'll have my staff get to you," McCain told Politico in Las Cruces, N.M. "It's condominiums where — I'll have them get to you."
The correct answer is at least four, located in Arizona, California and Virginia, according to his staff. Newsweek estimated this summer that the couple owns at least seven properties.
Actually, the answer is 8 or 9, according to the woman with whom he cheated on his first wife. This is the same woman who thinks flying is the only way to travel in Arizona, you know, since they apparently don't have paved roads in the state.
If the Obama camp doesn't have a commercial up about this remark, they are idiots who will lose in November.
Chinese authorities have ordered two elderly women to spend one year in a labor camp after they applied to hold a protest during the Beijing Olympics against being forced from their homes, a relative said Wednesday.
The women were still at home three days after being officially notified but were under the observation of neighborhood watch group, said Li Xuehui, the son of one of the women.
Li said no cause was given for the order to imprison his 79-year-old mother, Wu Dianyuan, and her neighbor Wang Xiuying, 77.
"Wang Xiuying is almost blind and crippled. What sort of reeducation through labor can she serve?" Li said in a telephone interview. "But they can also be taken away at any time."
The order followed the pair's repeated attempts to apply for permission to hold a protest at one of three areas designated by the government as available for demonstrations during the games, which end Sunday.
Some 77 applications were lodged to hold protests but none went ahead[.]
But the government did get a list of 77 people who "volunteered" for labour camp.
A John McCain lackey posted this on the official web site today:
It may be typical of the pro-Obama Dungeons & Dragons crowd to disparage a fellow countryman's memory of war from the comfort of mom's basement, but most Americans have the humility and gratitude to respect and learn from the memories of men who suffered on behalf of others.
For the record, yes, I played Dungeons & Dragons and many other RPGs. Still do, in fact. Yet somehow, despite my constant sojourns into the world of fantasy, I am grounded enough in reality to have been absolutely correct about the stupidity of NeoCons and their war. While I haven't run into that many NeoCons in D&D, I did run into them playing more traditional (surprise) games.
For your enjoyment, I present to you the poster boy of the NeoCon tactical mind. Sadly, idiots just like Rimmer have been given power, and allowed to make decisions costing people life and limb.